FORM
1.10 Petition for Bifurcation
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF __________________ COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PLAINTIFF
vs No.
DEFENDANT
RULE
AND
NOW, this __________________ day of __________________, 20 ______, upon
consideration of
__________________'s
Petition for Bifurcation, a Rule is hereby entered upon the respondent,
__________________, to show cause
why the relief requested should not be granted. Rule Returnable
with hearing thereon the __________________ day of __________________,
20 ______, at
__________________.
M., in Courtroom __________________, in the __________________ County
Courthouse, __________________, Pennsylvania.
BY THE COURT:
__________________
J.
[Caption]
DECREE AND ORDER
AND
NOW, this __________________ day of __________________, 20 ______, after
hearing on
Plaintiff's/Defendant's
Petition for Bifurcation, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that:
1. The
divorce action is bifurcated from the pending ancillary economic claims.
2. The
Court retains jurisdiction of any pending economic claims raised by either
party.
3. The
parties are enjoined from encumbering, dissipating, selling, or otherwise
alienating any and all
marital assets.
4. Plaintiff/Defendant
shall maintain the existing level of support of $ ____________ as alimony pendente
lite.
5. Plaintiff/Defendant
shall maintain all existing health, life or other insurance for
Plaintiff/Defendant.
6. Plaintiff/Defendant
shall maintain Plaintiff/Defendant as a beneficiary of any and all retirement
benefits
of Plaintiff/Defendant.
7. The
applicability of the Dead Man's Rule is waived.
BY THE COURT:
J.
PETITION FOR BIFURCATION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF __________________ COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
PLAINTIFF
vs
No.
DEFENDANT
PETITION FOR BIFURCATION
Petitioner,
by his/her attorney, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant the
Petition for
Bifurcation,
and in support thereof avers as follows:
1. Petitioner is __________________,
the Plaintiff/Defendant in the above-captioned divorce action.
2. Respondent is __________________,
the Plaintiff/Defendant in the above-captioned divorce action.
3. Petitioner and Respondent were
married on __________________, at __________________. They
have __________________ children: __________________ (born
__________________, 19 ______)
and __________________ (born __________________, 19 ______).
4. On __________________, Petitioner
commenced a divorce action by filing a Complaint in Divorce as
of the
above docket number seeking, inter alia, equitable distribution of
marital property, alimony, counsel
fees, costs and expenses.
5. On __________________, Petitioner
filed an Affidavit pursuant to Section 3301(d) [or (c)] of the
Divorce
Code alleging, inter alia, that the parties separated on
__________________, and have continued
to live separate and apart for at least two (2) years and that the
marriage is irretrievably broken [or, in the
alternative, that both parties have filed Affidavits
of Consent to the divorce]. Respondent did not file a
CounterAffidavit challenging Petitioner's
allegations regarding the date of separation or the irretrievable
breakdown of the parties' marriage.
6. Petitioner
has filed an Inventory as required by the Rules of Court.
7. Respondent
has failed to file an Inventory notwithstanding frequent requests for him/her
to do so.
8. Petitioner
has filed a Pre-Trial Statement pursuant to the Rules of Court. Respondent has
failed to file a
Pre-Trial Statement.
9. The
parties have exchanged Answers to Interrogatories, and all other discovery has
been completed.
10. The parties file separate tax
returns.
11. Both parties are in good health
and there is little likelihood of a shortened lifespan.
12. The parties have their own
separate health insurance coverage [or, Petitioner agrees to maintain health
insurance for Respondent during the pendency of
these proceedings].
13. Based upon the economic status of
the parties, there is no likelihood that either will file for bankruptcy.
14. Neither party's property rights
would be affected in any way by a bifurcation of the divorce from the
pending economic issues.
15. The parties have maintained an
economic status quo during the separation that Petitioner has no
intention of disturbing.
16. Bifurcation would not disturb that
economic status quo.
17. Petitioner has been living with
__________________ for ____________ years. Petitioner loves
__________________
and it is their mutual intention to marry following
the Petitioner's divorce.
18. Petitioner agrees to waive the Deadman's Rule.
19. Petitioner believes and avers that
the advantages of bifurcation of this divorce action are substantially
greater than the disadvantages for the
following reasons: (i) A speedy resolution of the
divorce issue
would allow the parties to restructure their personal lives. (ii)
Bifurcation will accelerate the dissolution of
the parties' marriage which has been acknowledged by both parties to
be irretrievably broken. (iii)
Bifurcation
will further the policy behind Pennsylvania's Divorce Code in making the legal
dissolution of
marriage effective for dealing with the reality
of matrimonial experience by taking into primary
consideration the welfare of the family
rather than the vindication of private rights. 23 Pa.
C.S.A. § 3102(a).
(iv) Bifurcation of this divorce action will
also separate the dissolution of the marriage from the distribution
of property so that the marriage and each party's personal life are
not held hostage to economic demands.
(v)
Bifurcation of the divorce action will in no way prejudice, diminish or impair
Respondent's economic
claims under the Divorce Code.
WHEREFORE,
Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court grant his/her Petition for
Bifurcation,
reserving jurisdiction on the economic claims
raised by the parties.
__________________
Attorney
for Petitioner
[Verification]